Re-reading Luke's community
The ambivalence of location and identification from a social identity complexity lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2021.v7n1.a29Abstract
This article interrogates and examines the community of Luke and the ambivalence of the location, composition, and identity problematics issues through the Social Identity Complexity perspective (SIC hereafter). The fundamental questions which this article seeks to grapple with are: Was the community of Luke Corinth, Ephesus, or Antioch? Which social boundary markers were erected among the multiple and complex social groups within the community of Luke? The arguments in this article are framed by insights from the Social Identity Complexity Theory which was developed by Roccas and Brewer (2002). The SIC perspective is useful and relevant in re-reading and problematizing identity markers of the numerous social groups within the community of Luke. The article also explores a significant aspect of the troubled composition of the social groups in the community of Luke. This study established that there are multiple and complex social identity formations in Luke's community. Furthermore, the social identities of the members of the Lukan community were fluid, nuanced, and troubled, as highlighted in the discussion in this article.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Tobias Marevesa, Esther Mavengano-Marevesa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Please note that erroneous copyright information is given in the PDFs before Volume 9, 2023.