Reflections on Peter Nagel’s article
Problematising the Divinity of Jesus: Why Jesus is not Theos – including a short history of the doctrine of the Trinity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17570/stj.2024.v10n1.1Keywords:
Athanasius, Augustine, divinity, doctrine, Iesous, Lohse, Nagel, Nicaea, Origen, Theos, Trinity, Van Aarde, IrenaeusAbstract
This is a response to an article written by South African New Testament scholar, Peter Nagel. The article draws on the thoughts of another South African New Testament scholar Andries van Aarde and of German theologian Bernhard Lohse, on the history of the doctrine of the Trinity. Concluding observations include inquiring as to how the church will effectively address this type of study in its deliberations and decisions.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chris Jones
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Please note that erroneous copyright information is given in the PDFs before Volume 9, 2023.
